SHARE :      

Key Legal Considerations:

• Transparency and Consent: Organizations must be transparent about the data they collect and how they use it, including the inferences they make. User consent is often required, especially for sensitive data.
• Data Minimization: Organizations should collect only the data necessary for the specified purpose and avoid making overly broad or speculative inferences.
• Data Security: Robust security measures are essential to protect user data from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure.

DPDPA 2023 and DPDP Rules 2025: Current Scope and Gaps

The DPDPA focuses on "personal data," which it defines as any data about an individual that can identify them. It also emphasizes the importance of consent, data fiduciary obligations, and penalties for non-compliance.

However, the Act does not specifically address inference data or attention data as distinct categories. Why is this a potential issue?

• Lack of Explicit Protection: Attention and inference data often fall into grey areas because they are derived or abstracted from original data sources. What’s Missing: The Act does not address data types generated indirectly, such as user behavior (attention data) or derived insights (inference data). Why It Matters: Attention and inference data can reveal sensitive aspects of a user’s life, such as habits, preferences, and vulnerabilities. For example, eye-tracking data (attention data) on a website could be used to predict a user’s emotional state or intent.
• Consent Challenges: Users rarely consent to their behavioral data being analyzed to produce inferences. Yet, these inferences can have profound consequences, such as targeted advertising or discriminatory pricing. What’s Missing: The consent framework under DPDPA does not address how consent applies to the generation of inferences or the analysis of behavioral data. Why It Matters: Users rarely consent explicitly to having their behavior analyzed to produce inferences, such as predicting socioeconomic status or political leanings. Yet, these inferences can have far-reaching impacts, such as targeted advertising, price discrimination, or even denial of services.
• Potential for Misuse: Without clear regulation, companies may exploit these data types without accountability, risking user privacy and autonomy. What’s Missing: The absence of clear guidelines leaves room for companies to exploit these data types without oversight. Why It Matters: Without regulation, attention and inference data can be used for manipulative practices, such as 

What Do International Data Protection Laws Say?

India isn't alone in grappling with the challenges of regulating inference and attention data. The OECD Privacy Guidelines advocate for proportionality in data use, emphasizing that processing must not infringe on user rights. Let’s examine how some leading international frameworks approach the issue:

• GDPR (EU): Inference data is considered personal data if it can be linked back to an individual. GDPR’s Article 22 addresses automated decision-making, indirectly governing the use of inference data. However, attention data is not explicitly classified.
• CCPA/CPRA (California): The CCPA and CPRA recognize profiling-related data. Attention data isn’t named explicitly but could fall under behavioral data when linked to an individual.
• Canada’s PIPEDA: Recognizes inferred data as personal information if linked to an individual. Proposed updates aim to strengthen the regulation of AI-generated inferences.
• Australia’s Privacy Act: Proposed reforms expand definitions of personal data to include inferences and metadata.

Should DPDPA Take a Cue? What Changes I would Suggest ?

India’s DPDPA 2023 has room to evolve. Including attention and inference, data would address critical privacy challenges. By expanding its scope to explicitly address attention data and inference data, the DPDPA can bridge critical gaps and align with global best practices. Let’s delve deeper into why this evolution is essential and how it can be implemented effectively. Here’s why:

1. Ensuring Transparency: Users Deserve to Know - Transparency is the cornerstone of any robust privacy framework. Today, attention data (such as time spent on a webpage or ad interactions) and inference data (such as lifestyle predictions derived from purchase history) are often processed in the shadows, leaving users unaware of their digital footprint’s extent and implications.

Proposed Enhancements for Transparency:
• Clear Disclosure Mechanisms: Mandate that organizations provide accessible, plain-language disclosures about how attention and inference data are collected, processed, and used. For instance, websites and apps could feature a “Data Use Summary” detailing these practices.
• User-Friendly Data Logs: Require companies to maintain and share logs of inferred insights, enabling users to verify, challenge, or erase inferences. This aligns with the GDPR’s right to access and rectification.
• Regular Audits: Implement mandatory data audits to verify that organizations uphold transparency standards, with findings published in annual privacy reports.

2. Strengthening Consent: Empowering Users with Choice - Consent lies at the heart of privacy protection. While the DPDPA emphasizes obtaining user consent, it does not explicitly address consent for behavioral analysis or the generation of inferences. Without explicit safeguards, users may unknowingly consent to far-reaching data uses.

Proposed Enhancements for Consent:
• Granular Consent Options: Implement multi-layered consent mechanisms, allowing users to consent to basic data collection but opt out of behavioral analysis or profiling.
• Informed Consent Requirements: Enforce strict guidelines requiring organizations to explain the potential outcomes of generating inferences, such as targeted advertising or price discrimination.
• Real-Time Consent Updates: Develop tools to dynamically inform users when new inferences are drawn, enabling them to revoke or modify consent. For example, if a user’s shopping patterns infer a lifestyle preference, they should be notified immediately.

3. Mitigating Risks: Protecting Individuals and Promoting Ethics -The unregulated use of attention and inference data poses significant risks, from discrimination to invasive profiling. Ensuring that organizations adhere to ethical data usage practices is critical for preserving individual autonomy and trust.

Proposed Enhancements for Risk Mitigation:
• Algorithmic Accountability: Require companies to assess the fairness and bias of algorithms used for generating inferences, similar to the EU’s AI Act requirements.
• Data Minimization Principles: Mandate that attention and inference data be processed only for necessary and proportional purposes, preventing overreach.
• Ethical Guidelines for Sensitive Inferences: Prohibit the use of inference data to draw conclusions about sensitive topics, such as health conditions or political beliefs, without explicit user consent.

4. Aligning with Global Standards: Easing Compliance and Building Trust - By harmonizing with international frameworks, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the DPDPA can position India as a global privacy leader while simplifying compliance for multinational organizations.

Proposed Alignments with Global Standards:
• Adopting GDPR-Like Profiling Rules: Incorporate restrictions on automated decision-making and profiling, ensuring users can contest decisions based solely on inferences.
• Cross-Border Data Flow Protections: Require heightened scrutiny for transferring attention and inference data internationally, similar to the GDPR’s provisions on data export.
• Uniform Definitions: Align definitions of personal data, attention data, and inference data with global standards to facilitate interoperability.

What do I think?

The world is shifting from merely safeguarding raw data to addressing the ethical and legal challenges posed by derived data like attention and inferences. For India, the DPDPA 2023 and DPDP Rules 2025 are a step forward, but it needs to anticipate emerging issues to stay relevant. As individuals, understanding how our digital attention and inferred identities are monetized and manipulated is crucial. As businesses, respecting these data boundaries can build trust and long-term loyalty. So, shouldn’t attention data and inference data get their due place under India’s data protection framework? Absolutely! It’s time we expanded the conversation—and the regulations—to truly protect the digital identities we’re creating every second in this multiverse of multiverses.

Reaching Author : Email - info@cyberlawconsulting.com | Know more about the Author on www.prashantmali.com

SHARE :