Logo
Logo
DPDPA Sections DPDP Rules BLOGS CASE LAWS FAQ's Templates
  • DPDP RULES 2025
  • Rules (1 – 3)
    • Rule 1: Short title and commencement. -
    • Rule 2: Definitions.
    • Rule 3: Notice given by Data Fiduciary to Data Principal.
  • Rules ( 4 – 5)
    • Rule 4: Registration and obligations of Consent Manager.
    • Rule 5: Processing for provision or issue of subsidy, benefit, service, certificate, licence or permit by State and its instrumentalities.—(
  • Rules (6 – 8)
    • Rule 6: Reasonable security safeguards.
    • Rule 7: Intimation of personal data breach.
    • Rule 8: Time period for specified purpose to be deemed as no longer being served.
  • Rules (9 – 12)
    • Rule 9: Contact information of person to answer questions about processing.
    • Rule 10: Verifiable consent for processing of personal data of child or of person with disability who has lawful guardian.
    • Rule 11: Exemptions from certain obligations applicable to processing of personal data of child
    • Rule 12: Additional obligations of Significant Data Fiduciary
  • Rules ( 13 – 15)
    • Rule 13: Rights of Data Principal.
    • Rule 14: Processing of personal data outside India.
    • Rule 15: Exemption from Act for research, archiving or statistical purposes.
  • Rule ( 16 – 18)
    • Rule 16: Appointment of Chairperson and other Members.
    • Rule 17: Salary, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other Members.
    • Rule 18: Procedure for meetings of Board and authentication of its orders, directions and instruments.—(.
  • Rules ( 19 – 20)
    • Section 19: Functioning of Board as digital office.
    • Section 20: Terms and conditions of appointment and service of officers and employees of Board.
  • Rules ( 21 – 22)
    • Section 21: Appeal to Appellate Tribunal.
    • Section 22: Calling for information from Data Fiduciary or intermediary.
  • SCHEDULE I
    • Part A-Conditions of registration of Consent Manager | Part B-Obligations of Consent Manager
  • SCHEDULE II
    • Standards for processing of personal data by State and its instrumentalities under clause (b) of section 7 and for processing of personal data necessary for the purposes specified in clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 17
  • SCHEDULE III
    • Table for Class of Data Fiduciaries| Purposes | Time period.
  • SCHEDULE IV
    • Part A -Classes of Data Fiduciaries in respect of whom provisions of sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 9 shall not apply | Part B - Purposes for which provisions of sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 9 shall not apply
  • SCHEDULE V
    • Terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other Members
  • SCHEDULE VI
    • Terms and conditions of appointment and service of officers and employees of Board
  • SCHEDULE VII
    • Table for Purpose | Authorised person
  • Explanatory Note of MEITY
    • Explanatory note to Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025
  • Responsive image

Rule 19 DPDP RULES 2025

Functioning of Board as digital office.—.


The Board shall function as a digital office which, without prejudice to its power to summon and enforce the attendance of any person and examine her on oath, may adopt techno-legal measures to conduct proceedings in a manner that does not require physical presence of any individual.

Rule 2 →
DPDPA
Table of contents


Report error
Your message ×

Please keep in mind that this form is only for feedback and suggestions for improvement. Unfortunately, questions will not be answered.

0 of 1000 max characters

Legal Interpretation of Rule 19 DPDP Rules 2025: Functioning of the Board as a Digital Office

In the modern world where technology seamlessly integrates into every aspect of life, Rule 19 of the DPDP Rules 2025 introduces a futuristic vision for the Data Protection Board of India (the Board). This rule reimagines governance and dispute resolution by mandating the Board to operate as a digital office. The intent? To make legal proceedings more accessible, efficient, and inclusive.This step started by digitising the Grievance Appellate Committee mentioned under The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2023. This suggestion of ODR in greviance handling under The IT Act,2000 was put forth by Advocate (Dr.) Prashant Mali. Let’s break it down and see why this is a revolutionary step for legal and administrative processes in India.

The Core of Rule 19

Rule 19 explicitly directs the Board to function as a "digital office." What does this mean in practice? It signifies a paradigm shift from traditional, in-person hearings to a predominantly virtual setup. The rule preserves the Board’s authority to summon individuals, enforce attendance, and examine witnesses under oath. However, it introduces an option to leverage "techno-legal measures" to carry out these tasks digitally. Essentially, Rule 19 allows the Board to conduct its proceedings without requiring physical presence—a leap forward in reducing procedural delays and accessibility challenges.

Efficiency Meets Accessibility

Imagine navigating through bureaucratic red tape or traveling long distances just to attend a hearing. It’s cumbersome, time-consuming, and often costly. Rule 19 flips this narrative by offering a digital-first approach. Here’s how:

  • Time-Saving: Virtual proceedings mean fewer delays caused by logistical issues or scheduling conflicts.
  • Cost-Effective: Parties save on travel, accommodation, and other related expenses.
  • Geographic Inclusivity: People from rural or remote areas can now participate in proceedings without the need for physical travel.

By embracing technology, Rule 19 ensures that justice is not a privilege limited by geography or resources—it’s a right accessible to all.

Tech-Driven Justice: A Bold Vision in the AI age

At its heart, Rule 19 aligns with the Digital India initiative, which aims to empower citizens through technology. The idea of a digital office is more than just a convenient arrangement; it’s a commitment to innovation and adaptability in governance. This move sets a precedent for other regulatory bodies, highlighting the advantages of digital transformation in public administration.

The Board’s digital functionality may include:

  • Virtual Hearings: Utilizing secure video conferencing platforms for seamless participation.
  • E-Filing and E-Documentation: Allowing parties to submit and access documents digitally with DSC.
  • Automated Scheduling: Leveraging AI tools to manage case schedules efficiently.
  • Key Features of the Digital Office can be
  • 1. Virtual Hearings: The Board can hold hearings via secure video conferencing platforms, ensuring procedural integrity while saving time and resources.
  • 2. Techno-Legal Tools: From e-signatures to blockchain-based evidence tracking, the Board leverages cutting-edge tools to maintain transparency and authenticity.
  • 3. Digital Summons and Notices: Parties receive communications through email, secure portals, or mobile apps, eliminating postal delays.
  • 4. Online Documentation: Submissions, pleadings, and evidence are uploaded and stored securely in digital repositories.

These tools collectively ensure that the Board operates at peak efficiency while maintaining fairness and transparency.

Challenges and Safeguards

Of course, no innovation comes without its challenges. A digital office must tackle several critical issues:

  • Cybersecurity Risks: Protecting sensitive personal data and confidential proceedings is paramount. This necessitates robust encryption, secure communication channels, and regular audits to detect vulnerabilities.
  • Digital Divide: Not everyone has equal access to technology. Ensuring that individuals from underprivileged backgrounds can participate is crucial for maintaining equity.
  • Technical Glitches: Technology isn’t foolproof. The Board must have contingency plans to address potential disruptions.

Rule 19 implicitly calls for these safeguards to be embedded into the Board’s digital operations, ensuring that efficiency doesn’t come at the cost of fairness.

Why Rule 19 Matters

The introduction of Rule 19 is a reflection of how governance is evolving to keep up with societal needs. By adopting a digital office framework, the Board is not just addressing current inefficiencies but also future-proofing its operations. This approach:

  • Simplifies Processes: By reducing procedural bottlenecks, the rule makes it easier for individuals and organizations to interact with the Board.
  • Promotes Transparency: Digital records and processes create an auditable trail, enhancing accountability.
  • Supports Environmental Goals: Reduced paper use and fewer physical hearings contribute to eco-friendly governance.

The Road Ahead

Rule 19 isn’t just about technology; it’s about creating a justice system that resonates with modern-day realities. By prioritizing accessibility, efficiency, and inclusivity, the rule paves the way for a more dynamic and responsive legal ecosystem. It’s a bold move that challenges the status quo, setting a benchmark for regulatory bodies worldwide.

In a world where justice often seems slow and inaccessible, Rule 19 offers a ray of hope. It embodies the spirit of progress, reminding us that legal systems, too, can adapt to the digital age. As this rule takes shape, one can only imagine the possibilities it unlocks—not just for the Board but for governance as a whole.

© 2025 Advocate (Dr.) Prashant Mali

Logo

Site maintained by Advocate (Dr.) Prashant Mali for Public in General interest

Share: Facebook | Twitter | XING | LinkedIn | WhatsApp | E-mail


Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  Disclaimer